![]() ![]() The native Windows network file sharing protocol is the preferred protocol for Windows servers. In trusted home networks, NFS without encryption is the best choice on Linux for maximum performance. SMB is a bit more tedious but allows user-based authentication, printer sharing and can be shared with multi-users. ![]() However, its authentication system only uses client IP address and it’s pretty hard to seperate several users from a single machine. NFS is fast and easy to set up and uses Linux rights which is pretty straightforward. However, SMB provides a user-based authentication.ĥ. ![]() NFS uses the host-based authentication system. NFS generally is faster when we are reading/writing a number of small files, it is also faster for browsing.Ĥ. SMB is not case sensitive where NFS is, this makes a big difference when it comes to a search.ģ. NFS is suitable for Linux users whereas SMB is suitable for Windows users.Ģ. If rsync is used for file transfer, NFS is always better than SMB using plain text and encryption.ġ. However, with encryption, NFS is better than SMB.Īnd for random write, NFS is slightly better than SMB when using plain text and encryption. In the case of a random read, the performance of NFS and SMB are almost the same when using plain text. However, with encryption, NFS is slightly better than SMB. However, with encryption, NFS is better than SMB.Īnd for sequential write, the performance of NFS and SMB are almost the same when using plain text. In the case of sequential read, the performance of NFS and SMB are almost the same when using plain text. For larger files, the timings of both methods are almost the same. NFS offers better performance and is unbeatable if the files are medium-sized or small. SMB write : 324 seconds Read operations Files : 6998 files of 10 KB each NFS vs SMB Write operations Files : 6998 files of 10 KB each Since NFSv4 it’s possible to use a Kerberos server, which extends the authentication system. However, SMB provides a user-based authentication. This means that every user on an authenticated machine can access a specific share. Key points for Comparison between NFS and SMBĪn important difference between both protocols is the way they authenticate. Today let’s compare the performance of NFS and SMB. Here at Bobcares, we handle servers with NFS and SMB as a part of our Server Management Services. Since SMB is supported by Windows, many companies and home networks use it by default. SMB and NFS are network protocols of the application layer, used mainly for accessing files over the network. NFS vs SMB – Are you confused to choose between them? We can help you. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |